Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colors (Crossfade song)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Crossfade (album). (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 05:14, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Colors (Crossfade song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable song. Although the song charted, there is no justifiable reason for an independent article. As per WP:MUSIC, "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, ... are probably notable" and "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article". A huge description of the music video does not constitute a detailed or informative article, with "significant coverage in reliable sources" also lacking and thus failing WP:GNG. Nouse4aname (talk) 16:43, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Crossfade, as per WP:NSONGS, which states that: "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song." If the redirect is reverted, an admin can always protect the page.--hkr Laozi speak 17:28, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Jezhotwells (talk) 18:46, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to
We All BleedCrossfade (album) as stated above. Also, it's apparent that a fan of the band is pushing for these marginal song articles without appreciation for notability guidelines, so maybe protecting will be necessary. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:44, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]- I agree with this decision, but thought it should be pointed out that this one shouldn't be redirected to We All Bleed, it's not on that album. It's on their self-titled album. (And no, I'm not the fan who keeps making these articles.) Sergecross73 msg me 20:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oops, my mistake. The prose in my vote above has been fixed accordingly. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:23, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with this decision, but thought it should be pointed out that this one shouldn't be redirected to We All Bleed, it's not on that album. It's on their self-titled album. (And no, I'm not the fan who keeps making these articles.) Sergecross73 msg me 20:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I understand these aren't the easiest search terms, but has anyone looked to see if this song article is expandable? - Theornamentalist (talk) 18:23, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I have, and this song (and others by the same band that are currently in the AfD stage) have not been discussed by reliable third-party sources as separate entities from their respective albums. So anything that can be said about these songs (which isn't much) can be said at the album articles. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.